Economics of nutrient runoff

Reducing nutrient runoff in Ohio waters may take more creative thinking than just instituting water conservation programs, according to an Ohio State University expert.

Farmers and producers may have to get by with fewer nutrients on crops in order to prevent more contamination to Ohio’s streams, rivers and lakes, said Brent Sohngen, an agricultural economist with Ohio State’s Ohio Agricultural Research and Development Center.

“We can do better than what we’ve done,” he said. “We really haven’t gotten our money’s worth in terms of water quality with the current programs that we are using.

“It just may take different thinking if we really want to reduce the nutrient output on the landscape. That means we can’t just rely on trapping the nutrients using traditional conservation efforts, or changing the timing of our applications by holding manure in pits until the ground has thawed. Instead, we may just have to reduce the overall nutrient input.”

Sohngen, who also has an appointment with Ohio State University Extension and is a professor in Ohio State’s Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics, will talk about water quality and best management practices (BMPs) during a Mid-Ohio Regional Planning Commission forum on how phosphorous impacts Ohio’s rivers, lakes and streams.

The presentation, “Nutrient BMPs: Voluntary Incentives, Regulation, Free Markets – What Will It Take to Keep Ohio’s Waters Clean?” is July 6 at 10 a.m. at the MORPC offices, 111 Liberty St., Suite 100, in Columbus. The event is free and open to the public.

The discussion focuses on how government programs to encourage voluntary practices to minimize nutrients in agricultural runoff are working and what else can be done. That includes watersheds that are implementing nutrient trading experiments to reduce runoff and possible new regulations.

“We need to push ourselves to try new things to be bolder than what we have been,” Sohngen said. “Reducing nutrients is much more costly than people realize.”

Sohngen holds a doctorate in natural resource and environmental economics from Yale University. He has interests in the area of natural resource and environmental economics, including valuing environmental change, modeling land use and land cover change, and the economics of non-point source pollution.

Print Friendly

Related Posts

One thought on “Economics of nutrient runoff”

  1. A Renewable and sustainable solution
    Increase nutrient credits
    Wastewater treatment (or any discharge).

    ALGAE Photobioreactor. No chemicals to buy or costly filters to replace
    Phosphorus .02 mg/l
    Nitrogen .2 mg/l
    and Much more From Arsenic to Mercury , and Selenium
    Watersheds meeting any changing TMDL from
    the EPA/DEQ

    STOP Algae blooms
    before they
    start.

    co2 consumption

    you can put co2 from a smoke stack
    or other source straight into
    treating the Water, Algae will use the
    co2
    and clean
    (eat) the rest.
    Can you imagine, a refinery
    with low or off
    set co2 emissions.

    Jim Holler
    Virtual Water

    406 451 2411

Leave a Reply