The challenging growing conditions have created the potential for and concern about aflatoxin in corn. Agronomists are pushing farmers to get corn out of the fields as quickly as possible to try to void problems that, so far, have not shown up in a significant way in Ohio.
The potential for aflatoxin in corn, though, has not been lost on those who import U.S. corn. It should be noted, however, that although growing conditions may vary from year to year, U.S. grades and safety standards for grain remain stable. The U.S. grain marketing system ensures that domestic and export buyers receive safe cargoes of corn based on buyer-seller contract terms and the minimum requirements of U.S. grain grades and standards. The U.S. Grains Council closely monitors aflatoxin levels in the United States so it can appropriately address the concerns of its global customers. The Council’s annual U.S. Corn Harvest Quality Report, set to be released at the end of November, will be a key tool in releasing this information.
This year’s drought and high temperatures across the Midwest have raised concerns about possibly higher levels of aflatoxin, which in elevated levels in feed can cause sickness or death in animals. Aflatoxin occurs naturally in crops, usually at very low levels that do not pose a threat to animal health. The U.S. grain marketing system monitors corn continuously to ensure that corn with elevated levels of aflatoxin is not transported. Safety standards for U.S. corn are the same for both domestic and export shipments.
All corn export shipments from the United States are tested for aflatoxin, and buyers can specify additional testing should they choose.
Jay O’Neil of Kansas State University noted that any graded grain, such as No. 2 or No. 3 U.S. corn, can contain only 20 parts per billion aflatoxin or less for it to be exported. “This is one way foreign buyers are protected,” he said.
The FDA has set use guidelines for corn containing aflatoxin. In general, they are based on maintaining performance and avoiding disease related to aflatoxin, except for dairy cattle in which prevention of aflatoxin residues in milk is the main concern. For example, human foods and feed intended for dairy cattle must contain less than 20 parts per billion.
Some aflatoxin levels have been observed in several U.S. Corn Belt states, with almost all below the 20 parts per billion limit. For example, one private grain inspection service in Nebraska said most of the tests it has completed were zero or only one part per billion. Those lots of corn with elevated aflatoxin levels will be diverted into feed for local beef cattle that can consume that grain without harmful health effects.
“So far this harvest season, aflatoxin does not appear to be a significant problem,” O’Neil said. “However, we will know more once more of the crop has been harvested, and certainly we will keep an eye on it.”
About 10% of the crop has been harvested as of Sept. 2.
“Thus far, the problem does not appear widespread; however, fields across the state are at risk for aflatoxin considering the hot, dry conditions we had during pollination and are having now as much of the crop reaches black layer,” said Alison Robertson, from the plant pathology department at Iowa State University about Iowa’s corn crop.
Corn-based ethanol plants, which produce distiller’s dried grains with solubles (DDGS), generally have a lower aflatoxin threshold — even zero — because aflatoxin can be concentrated in the DDGS. U.S. DDGS importers who are concerned can require aflatoxin testing and set limits in their purchase contracts.
Local grain elevators screen all incoming loads of corn for the aflatoxin-producing fungus. Grain elevators can refuse corn that is over 20 parts per billion aflatoxin unless they can segregate it from non-contaminated corn and they have a known, approved local use for it.