License fee increase requested by Ohio sportsmen

According to the Columbus-based Sportsmen’s Alliance, Ohio’s hunters, fishermen and trappers are doing something most citizens never do: asking Ohio’s governor, state representatives and state senators to raise the license fees for these activities in Ohio. Concerned about counties with no law enforcement presence, decreasing fish stocking, decreases in wildlife habitat management, and a growing list of projects that need to be done, some of Ohio’s top conservation groups are united in asking the legislature to allow sportsmen to continue to pay their own way as they have done for decades.

The Ohio Department of Natural Resources Division of Wildlife (ODOW) is funded almost entirely (96%) by sportsmen’s dollars. These funds pay for law enforcement, wildlife habitat enhancements, endangered species programs, fish stocking, boating access, shooting ranges and much more. However, many of these programs have increasingly fallen on hard times because the fees paid by hunters, fishermen and trappers have not been updated for 14 years.

“In 2003, Ohio sportsmen and women promised then-Governor Bob Taft that if he raised license fees that the funds would last for at least ten years,” said Luke Houghton, associate director of state services for the Sportsmen’s Alliance. “We’ve gone well past that mark now, and it’s time to take action. Rising healthcare costs and other increases over the past 14 years have taken their toll on the services sportsmen and women, and all Ohioans, have come to rely upon. We’re asking Governor Kasich and the legislature to address this need by raising license fees.”

Unlike many government agencies that use general taxpayer dollars, Ohio sportsmen gladly pay their own way to ensure quality habitat, great fisheries, and diligent law enforcement. These things have made hunting a $1.4 billion per year economic driver in Ohio, and fishing more than double that at $2.9 billion per year.

“Without an increase however, customer satisfaction will continue to drop, and the hunting and fishing economies with it,” Houghton said. “Fortunately, this is all preventable because Ohio’s outdoor community is willing to pay for the needed improvements.”

The Sportsmen’s Alliance, along with 22 other conservation organizations are asking the legislature to address the issue by taking two steps. First, according to the Alliance, by addressing the cost of non-resident deer hunting in Ohio, which is the lowest of any quality whitetail deer hunting state in the country at $149 for a license and tag. The average for other high-quality deer states is $393, with the lowest cost states around $250. By raising the cost of nonresident deer hunting to $250, Ohio will remain attractive to the current 40,000 non-residents who hunt here, while decreasing the burden faced by resident hunters and anglers.

Second, the Sportsmen’s Alliance said that by addressing the inequity on non-resident costs, the increase on resident hunting and fishing fees could be a modest $3. The two user fee increases are fair to non-residents, and modest on Ohioans. More importantly, the group contends, they will provide the funds to solve the issues that concern Ohio’s sportsmen.  For more information, visit

Check Also

Between the Rows Update – Aug. 8, 2022

Matt Reese talked with Kurt Wyler, Coshocton County, and Nathan Birkemeier, Putnam County, for this …


  1. How stupid are these people running the state of Ohio! That’s why the hunting has dropped off , because of all the God damn nonresident coming in here, paying for high dollar leases & outfitters! No where to hunt for residents! Raise the nonresident licenses up to at least $400 or more! Do us a favor, put your damn foot down & sock it to them! Nonresidents! I would make the deer tags at least $75-$100! Let them pay! I pay out the ass if I go to Illinois hunting!

    • There was a time in southeastern Ohio when the land owned by the large paper mill company’s was public hunting,not so now. The land was cleared of all buildings and they probably got a tax break for hunting access. Then along came the leasing,adjoins land owners were supposed to have the first option on adjoining property. Never happened! Now individuals lease large tracks(several thousand acres ) then they form a hunting club,and charge outrageous prices for membership. This way they get around (the no sub lease clause). Leasing of hunting land is legal but it has put a dark cloud over hunting in our area.

    • It’s funny you say that, because here in NC during beach season we see a lot of Ohio tags, as well as Pennsylvania, New York, Rhode Island, and the list goes on and on. I personally don’t mind the people coming here to vacation at our beaches because I know in return I go to Ohio where I also LEASE land to deer hunt every year. It’s just the way things are. Some people here don’t like it, some there don’t like us going there to hunt and that’s fine. I can assure you as long as I have the money to commute from NC to Ohio every year to vacation during the month of November, I’ll continue to pay for that non-resident license. By the way I’ve never harvested a deer in the state of Ohio mainly because I haven’t seen anything over 150” from the stand. Good luck

Leave a Reply to Justin Sloan Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published.