Returns for Ohio corn at RMA projected prices

By Ben Brown, Department of Agricultural, Environmental, and Development Economics, The Ohio State University

The month of February represents the price discovery period for projected price of corn. The projected price represents the Risk Management Associations (RMA) baseline for establishing federally sponsored corn insurance products for 2019. The projected price for corn is the average of the February settlement prices for the December futures contract. The subsequent harvest price is the average of the October settlement prices for the same December futures contract. The projected price and the harvest price are used to identify the guaranteed revenue for revenue based crop insurance products. However, neither price takes into account local cash basis.

The projected price established by RMA for 2019 corn revenue is $4 per bushel. This is up $0.04 per bushel from the 2018 and 2017 projected prices of $3.96 per bushel representing the increase in corn prices during the last few months of 2018 after a drop during the summer months. Price volatility is considered when setting premium levels for insurance products. A higher volatility increases the premium paid by the producer if all else is equal. Volatility rates are set by averaging the volatility of the most recent five trading days. Corn volatility has continued decreasing and since 2011 is at its lowest point of 0.15.

In October, RMA will calculate the 2019 harvest price to set guaranteed revenue for the year. The projected price for corn has been higher than the harvest price the last six years after two years of increases in 2011 and 2012. For the entire series 2011-2018, the projected price was above the harvest price by $0.21 per bushel. Looking at only the last six years of high production values across the country, the projected price exceeded the harvest price by $0.64 per bushel. The December Futures contract is averaging below the Projected Price halfway through March. Several factors will determine the final harvest price for the December Futures contract between now and the discovery period in October.


Returns for Ohio corn based on 2019 projected prices

To calculate a cost of production for each crop reporting district in Ohio, OSU enterprise budgets were used along with inputs from credible sources. Yield estimates for each crop reporting district came from the most current 5 years of National Agricultural Statistic Service (NASS) data.

Insurance policies are based on an Actual Production History (APH), which represents a maximum of 10 previous years of yield records for a particular field or enterprise. Since the 2012 crop year, these yields have been adjusted to account for improved crop genetics and current practices. The Federal Crop Insurance Corporation Board approves a trend adjustment factor for corn and soybeans in each county. This factor is equal to the annual increase in yield, and is based on county average yields determined by NASS each year. For the calculations, a corn trend adjustment factor of 1.6 bushels is multiplied to the difference in the current year to the base year and then added to the yield of the base year. As an example, consider a county that has a yield in 2013 of 164 bushels per acre. Using 2017 as the current year, the adjustment would be ((2017-2013) 1.6) + 164) for an adjusted yield of 170 bushels per acre. Seeding rates for cost estimates were taken from the 2018 eField Report published by The Ohio State University. The most profitable seeding rate based on a $3.50 per 1,000 seeds was used in these cost calculations. Cash rent estimates for each crop reporting district were reported by NASS in 2017.

Ohio producers have the option to select coverage levels from 50% of APH to 85% of APH. Using the Summary of Business operations from the RMA website, the most popular coverage level for Ohio corn producers is 80%. For this article, it is assumed that an 80% APH coverage level is selected for revenue insurance products. An 80% coverage level means that the projected price is only covered on 80% of bushels not the total number of bushels.

When considering all acres, the uninsured acres have no direct revenue insurance coverage. In this case, it would equal the remaining 20% based on the 80% coverage level. The 2018 Farm Bill signed into law on Dec. 20, 2018 raised the marketing loan rates for covered commodities. These loan rates are often considered a price floor under commodity markets. In the case of corn, the marketing loan rate is $2.20 per bushel. If the marketing loan rate is used as the price floor for the remaining 20% bushels that are left uncovered then an adjustment can be made to cover all acres within a unit. The $3.64 per bushel represents the complete coverage of all acres: (0.80 x $4.00/ bu.) + ($2.20 x 0.20) = $3.64 per bushel.

Four of Ohio’s nine crop reporting districts showed higher costs of production compared to the $4 projected price. However, eight of the nine districts showed higher costs of production than the “Complete” coverage when adjusting for 80% revenue coverage. Southeast Ohio was the only crop reporting district to show gains compared to the projected price set by RMA for both covered bushels only and all bushels using the marketing loan rate of $2.20 as a price floor. The districts of Central, North Central and Northwest are at best meeting their cost of production, while West Central has cost of production above the revenue guarantee. These districts represent the majority of corn revenue policies and corn production for the state.

Many producers reported higher than normal yields in 2018. If higher than historical average yields appear again in 2019, cost of production per bushel will be reduced below these calculations. In 2019, these programs are protecting the downside risk for producers as proponents argue they were designed to do. Districts having net returns above cost of production have low production and low insurance coverage. Thus, these insurance programs are providing a risk management tool for Ohio producers.

Check Also

Victory Gardens program expands

A tremendous response to the just launched Victory Gardens campaign has resulted in an immediate …

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *